On Saturday 13 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > > Maybe the stuff in [patch 2/3] would better be modeled > > as JTAG events delivered to that TAP. Target code would > > just listen for TAP enable events. > > I was thinking the same thing.
Downside: complete lack of error handling, in code paths that are already deprived of such things. Of course, having adequate JTAG level error checks to make sure the expected TAP was added, in the right place, would ameliorate such concerns. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
