On Sunday 14 June 2009, Michael Bruck wrote:
> When I programmed this it used to work under arm11. If it does not
> work now, then someone broke the command code. This should be fixed
> rather than messing up the command structure.
Then you seem to be the best candidate for that ...
The arm11.c file went (IMO) a bit overboard with macros, but if
I mentally un-wrap them the issues seem to be that:
(a) arm11_register_commands() uses RC_TOP to define a toplevel
command ... seems to have done so since 27-feb-2008 though,
the original checkin for "memwrite";
(b) the BOOL_WRAPPER thing expects enable/disable as the SECOND
param, not the third as it would be with the "arm11".
I'm not sure I see how what got checked in ever worked with the
prefix though.
- Dave
> Michael
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:00 PM, David Brownell<[email protected]> wrote:
> > Fix glitches in ARM11 command doc: the commands
> > are "memwrite ..." not "arm11 memwrite ...". Both
> > the texi and the source code (!) got that wrong.
> > Re-alphabetize.
> > ---
> > doc/openocd.texi | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> > src/target/arm11.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > NOTE: making "arm11 memwrite ..." work would
> > be cleaner, but more work. Plus it would change
> > current behavior.
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
