On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 00:14 +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > We need to find some balance. Right now, the presses are too heavily > > biased toward "development" to the extent that "release" suffers badly. > > I definitely want to see a reset of the release timeout counter > when we discover such problems as we have seen in > the last week. > > The "step" bug alone would have made *all* the regression test > scripts fail... I wouldn't even want to ask Michael Fischer to > run the regression test suite without that one in place...
Right, so I do want to make it clear that some of these are entirely legitimate bugs that you are fixing. No dispute about that. In that regard, I am happy to reset the release deadline while we consider the patches. However, there does need to be a limit to the number of resets that we allow for new issues. Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
