On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 04:28 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote: > Hi, > > just a quick notification, I uploaded a 0.2.0 package to Debian unstable > (well, sort of, it's actually r2529). So far all architectures seem to > build fine, didn't check for warnings though (-Werror is disabled in the > build). > > https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=openocd > > > Hope that helps, Uwe.
Actually, I think it hurts; it skips 0.2.0 in favor of SVN. An important point of regular releases is to get users off of the repository and using releases. Packagers are the first place that should start. Which patches did you really need, which were committed between r2523 and r2529? I am dazed and confused that you chose to skip the stable release entirely. If 0.2.0 was not good enough, then please provide the list of things that you want addressed in 0.2.1. I prefer that packagers like yourself stop producing releases from SVN entirely; instead, the community should produce releases that address any packaging problems. Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
