Zach Welch escreveu: > Actually, I think it hurts; it skips 0.2.0 in favor of SVN. > An important point of regular releases is to get users off of the > repository and using releases. Packagers are the first place that > should start. Which patches did you really need, which were committed > between r2523 and r2529? I am dazed and confused that you chose to skip > the stable release entirely.
Could you explain which SVN version is the same as 0.2.0 ??? Reading SVN-history I was thinking that it should be 2519, because 2520 is 0.2.1 ... Thanks, Alain _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
