2009/7/23 Michel Catudal <[email protected]>:
>> [ 6100.256037] usb 4-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address
>> 4
>> [ 6100.447398] usb 4-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
>> [ 6100.453170] usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 4 if 0 alt 0
>> proto 2 vid 0x0640 pid 0x0033
>> [ 6100.470154] generic-usb 0003:0640:0033.0007: hiddev96,hidraw2: USB
>> HID v1.10 Device [Hitex Development Tools GmbH STM32com-Stick] on
>> usb-0000:00:1a.1-2/input1
>> [ 6100.479152] generic-usb 0003:0640:0033.0008: hiddev97,hidraw3: USB
>> HID v1.10 Device [Hitex Development Tools GmbH STM32com-Stick] on
>> usb-0000:00:1a.1-2/input2
>
>
> Hitex may very well have several versions for their USB debugging. There is
> an interest in getting something faster than the ftdi device.
> From what Leon posted, his device may not be an ftdi but some
> microprocessor.

That is possible. I remember that Silicon Labs UC3 USB JTAG
debugger uses HID as well.

But it will probably not faster than the FTDI device.
A full speed HID device is limited to 64KB/sec (64B/ms). The FTDI
device will use bulk transfer for data and it is in general faster than
the HID device.



-- 
Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to