Øyvind Harboe wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:43 PM, David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wednesday 21 October 2009, Řyvind Harboe wrote: >> >>> Once these changes and discussion has had some time to settle, >>> it would make sense to retire all the mXX_phys commands and let >>> the target.c implementation of mXX w/the phys flag handle those >>> cases... >>> >> You seem to have done this already (less associated doc >> updates) ... but I missed the "discussion" and "settle" >> stages! :) >> > > Yeah.... there was actually some prior discussion on this > a couple of days ago and I had a small "git mishap" earlier > today when I pushed some stuff that I didn't think was > going to be pushed. Moving ahead seemed like the best > choice. I'll be doing some more reading on git... > > >> There are also some uses of the *_phys stuff in tcl/* files >> that need to be updated... >> > > OK, will fix. > My 2 cents:
This is not a heavy useage area, since MMU virt/phys handling is very primitive. As far as I can se Öyvinds ideas are sound, setting up the infrastructure in target.c and doing a specific test implementation for 926ejs is a reasonable plan. When this works well, as Övind says, there must be some rewrites of target scripts and documentation to use the new and IHMO improved syntax. Then we can implement target specifc low level handlers. At the moment my BeagleBoard has developed a fever (methinks it is dead) and other work keeps calling, but I think for Cortex A8 and all Armv7A this should work fine. Best regards, Magnus (note: I have now agreed to Övinds proposals two days in a row without any complaints, perhaps I am losing my edge) _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
