On Friday 23 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > Here is a thought: > > Retire arm9 vector_catch C code and write a Tcl > proc instead on top of "reg vector_catch". > > Thoughts?
Erm ... why? Rename "arm9tdmi" to "arm9", sure. Bugfix the current code to preserve the user's setting for that register across resets, sure. > Why should targets other than arm9tdmi resort to > using "reg vector_catch" directly? So far as I know, they don't... > Doesn't targets like arm926ejs have vector_catch registers? The current "arm9tdmi vector_catch" works on arm926 already. As it says at the top of arm9tdmi.c! _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
