On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 23 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > > I'm not going to hold mcr/mrc hostage to arm11 C interface > > abstraction cleanup or somesuch. With the current changes > > committed, it will be a tiny matter to push the mcr/mrc back up > > to an arm specific interface once that separate issue has > > been resolved. > > I would rather have held off on that stuff till after 0.3.0 > is released, myself; right now the doc and the code are out > of sync, and it would have been nicer to just have one change.
Maybe you guys should just try to start using Git branches for real? I think that would have made perfect sense to fork a mcrmrc branch from master, put that stuff in there, even publish that branch to sourceforge. And similarly for any other RFC or anything that isn't a totally trivial change. Then this could be reviewed at ease, and anyone could even merge it into their owl local master (or any other test) branch for testing. Then, if there is consensus about the mcrmrc branch amongst the primary maintainers, it is rather trivial to merge it back into master and delete the mcrmrc branch from sourceforge. Since a switch to Git has been made, you should really start exploiting its best features (such as branches) and stop thinking like a SVN user. Nicolas
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
