> Yes armv4_5 is more of an intermediate (abstract) class than a pure
> interface. It is the "right" place also to implement some common
> functionality.

So making armv4_5 a pure interface first and then adding it to
arm11 would be a good step...

w.r.t. retiring old commands, I won't do that until I know for sure that
the new ones are tested. Possibly with some tcl proc frontend
to the new command to support the old syntax.

-- 
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to