On Sunday 25 October 2009, Magnus Lundin wrote: > The natural place for this would IHMO be armv4_5, this will include > Armv7A targets
There seems to be some agreement on "armv4_5" as the right place for such stuff to live. I'll hope we can get agreement that it should be renamed, and cleaned up to more completely separate implementation (v4/v5) bits from the "generic ARM" model it exposes. :) > but not Armv7M targets. To be a bit more general ... "not the Cortex-M targets". The M3 is ARMv7M. The M1 and M0 are ARMv6M. They all seem to differ from "generic ARM" in about the same way. Suggesting that names for the base classes should maybe be more like ARM_AR and ARM_M ... matching the V7 arch reference manuals. Clearly "ARM" isn't quite right! - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
