On Monday 26 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Even if MMU is disabled, an error is returned. This way the user
> is not lulled into believing that physical memory read/write is
> implemented for a target when it isn't really.

So the model is that everything should provide both
physical and "normal" memory accessors?  Even when
there's really no distinction between the two??

I'd rather see the current behavior *unless* there
is an MMU, in which case do what this patch does
(and return error, since no code bypasses the MMU).

- Dave




_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to