On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:48 AM, David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday 26 October 2009, Øyvind Harboe wrote: >> Even if MMU is disabled, an error is returned. This way the user >> is not lulled into believing that physical memory read/write is >> implemented for a target when it isn't really. > > So the model is that everything should provide both > physical and "normal" memory accessors? Even when > there's really no distinction between the two?? > > I'd rather see the current behavior *unless* there > is an MMU, in which case do what this patch does > (and return error, since no code bypasses the MMU).
There is no way to explicit way to check if a target has an MMU currently. -- Øyvind Harboe http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
