Hello guys! I try to maintain OpenOCD port for FreeBSD, and I think current numbering scheme sux and brings great confusion - there are two unused digits in the release number and now there is also a -rc0 suffix. This is a MESS! I don' like it. Why don't we name a release 0.3.0, make it public, fix errors for a week, release 0.3.1, fix errors for next week then release 0.3.2, if there are no errors add some features and release 0.3.3... if there are releases where only the middle number changes, why to use others? By the way - is 0.3.0 supposed to be an unstable release while the 0.4.0 is the next stable release (as in Linux kernel numbering)? Is all these numbers really necessary? Does anybody have control over these numbers?
What is more - a 0.3.0 release is available already on the download page (openocd 0.3.0 November 4, 2009) - is it 0.3.0 already or still the 0.3.0-rc0? If rc0 why it is named 0.3.0? :-( Regards, Tomek -- CeDeROM, http://www.tomek.cedro.info _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
