On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 13:05 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 20 November 2009, Zachary T Welch wrote: > > The current idiomatic usage > > suggests the addition of a usage field as well, to provide two levels > > of detail for users to consume (i.e. terse usage list, or verbose help). > > yeah, that's messy today. > > Likewise automagic wrapping at 48 characters (or whatever), > which wastes a lot of the available screen.
I have a new series based on this one that attacks command registration, adding a usage field. That said, how do you think the help text should be formatted and displayed? Personally, I am not averse to the new 'cmd_help' formatting that this introduces, and -- with the usage and help split -- the two commands will display much more sanely. Also, any reason to hold off on this present series or the USB series? --Z _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
