On Saturday 21 November 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > > > Could we get one less level of indent throughout? > > There a couple of arguments for using this style at the top-level: > - It's consistent with the other indenting. The statement has not been > completed, so the code should not return to the original tab-stop.
It's *NOT* consistent, since the first level of indent is double-sized. Though ... I'm also used to having *no* indent for new members of array structs; it's not as if there's any more structure to highlight. Which is why having *TWO* indents is particularly annoying... even one is superfluous. I'd not object to *two* less levels of intent. But at the least, be consistent about not *starting* indents with a double serving. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
