On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Laurent Gauch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> the official position of the maintainers is that we want a maintainable, >> documented SWD implementation or none at all. >> >> I know David hasn't been able to work on SWD as much as he had >> planned or hoped. >> > > Is this your position or really the position of all the maintainers ?
They can speak up for themselves if they disagree with the above, in which case I most profusely apologize for having spoken on their part. Generally patches should be maintainable and documented before they are accepted, SWD is no different. SWD is trickier than your average patch in that it is not an incremental change, but a more sweeping change. -- Øyvind Harboe US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
