On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:32 AM, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote: > There was good discussion investigating the problem: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=128119592700624 > > (read the entire thread) > > And on August 25 it ends with a (badly formatted) patch to revert > the commit, which has not been included in Linus' git tree. I assume > because it was badly formatted. >
I think this is not because it was badly formatted. It seems to me that there are different opinions whether to fix the kernel (reverse the patch) or fix the client program. It seems to me that it is not possible to make all users happy just by reversing the patch committed. http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=128188806903351&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=128265977323557&w=2 So for the OP, the best option is to reverse the kernel to 2.6.32-24. -- Xiaofan _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
