Xiaofan Chen wrote: > > (read the entire thread) I really meant this.
> > has not been included in Linus' git tree. I assume because it was > > badly formatted. > > I think this is not because it was badly formatted. It seems to me > that there are different opinions whether to fix the kernel > (reverse the patch) or fix the client program. It seems to me that > it is not possible to make all users happy just by reversing the > patch committed. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=128276513507083 and the two following messages in the thread, which come just a message or two after the ones you linked to. The patch introduces behavior for FTDI chips which is different from how other serial ports work. Greg requested a patch and one was sent, but in an invalid format unsuitable for inclusion. > So for the OP, the best option is to reverse the kernel to > 2.6.32-24. I agree completely! Until this is fixed upstream or by the distribution, the solution is no doubt to downgrade the kernel. //Peter _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
