On 10/12/2010 08:34, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Peter Stuge<[email protected]> wrote:
Øyvind Harboe wrote:
Two versions attached.
I'll leave it to you to decide which is the best way to
implement this
I prefer the longer but simpler to read one. Were it mostly a smaller
my own project then I'd gone with the shorter one.
I think optimizing for testability& readability is the way to go here.
Especially considering the evidence that this code doesn't get tested
a whole lot....
Not looked into it but why do we not just duplicate the existing
unregister event/timer functions - or are they broken aswell?
Cheers
Spen
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
