Andreas Fritiofson wrote: > > Now there's 3 versions to choose from :-) > > It's not too late. The target versions seems nice and readable. And > correct, as far as I can see this late hour. I think the jtag version > should follow the behavior of these and only remove the first matching > handler. That would be the correct thing to do, if there was a point > in having the same handler registered more than once.
Really? How are the callbacks being used? > The only issue I have with copying the target version is that having > the same code duplicated in three places probably warrants refactoring > it into a helper function instead. Which is difficult for something simple as a linked list, unless the list entries are identical, and of the same type. Are they? //Peter _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
