On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Tomek CEDRO <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Drasko DRASKOVIC > <[email protected]> wrote: >> (..) >> After this it can be replicated on any WWW location. >> At least we have it now in lists archives. That's better than nothing ;). > > There are or will be people looking for the answers you/we already > know, especially the details hard to find :-) Sure thing, mailing list > is also good place as search engines keeps looking on them too.. but > maybe we could start some developer-wiki where everything would be > kept in one place.. at least for me its more convenient to have one > up-to-date document rather than one base document and dozens of > erratas :-P sf.net provides simple mediawiki installation.. if that > makes sense? :-)
Hm... this sounds like a great idea to me. OpenOCD has a wonderful and serious documentation in the form of manual and Dominic's thesis that explains internals of the project. But it is maybe missing explanations of implementation/usage and practical information for the new ports. All this information is spread across mailing lists and forums (like SparcFun). I think it would be good to have additional project wiki, where developers can directly write about their implementations and collect the archive of specs... However, question is if there is enough interest/workforce to maintain these pages... BR, Drasko _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
