On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Spencer Oliver <[email protected]> wrote:
> After a quick look over i see your patch assumes that synci is
> supported by the target - may not be the case.

Hi Spen,
yes, this is true. Otherwise we can re-implement this with "cache"
command, but it will not be so nice.

If we decide to support both Release 1 and Release 2 of MIPS
architecture, then we will not be allowed to use bunch of functions
that are present only in Rel 2, which is by my opinion 10 years old.

What do you think ?

BR,
Drasko
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to