> http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/index.html > > In short, it's very slow (took over an hour to get through with OpenOCD on > my machine), and it's susceptible to false positives.
An hour is not the biggest problem if it saves a bunch of maintainer time. Can we choose some minimum threshold for what we'll accept in terms of errors like we do for gcc(-Werror -Wall is minimum acceptable for patches now). -- Øyvind Harboe - Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free 1-866-980-3434 http://www.zylin.com/ _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
