Thanks Jen, Bryan and MaryJo,
I read through your document and am quite keen to have this conversation. I
have a lot of jumbled thoughts. Will try to sort them out and come to this call
with my brain on.
It seems like trust is both a required input and output (e.g. as input a
contributor needs to trust their own contribution / mode of being has value,
other wise they won’t contribute in the first place. I’ve heard “they’re better
at that kind of thing…” or “yeah, but they don’t need my input" loads of times.
Also, there’s something about community enforcement* or just enforcement that
relates here…
• Transparency - trust builds partially because the documentation
shows
• Inclusivity - trust builds partially because we see that we are part
of a greater whole
• Adaptability - trust builds partially because we know our feedback
will have impact
• Collaboration - trust builds partially because we know our individual
diversity matters to the project/product/outcome
• Community - trust builds partially because the community has your
back in an open org
As I said, jumbled. Looking forward to the chat though!
—laura
Laura Hilliger
laurahilliger.com <http://laurahilliger.com/>
co-founder of weareopen.coop <http://weareopen.coop/>
@epilepticrabbit <http://twitter.com/epilepticrabbit>
> On Jan 29, 2018, at 3:18 PM, Jen Kelchner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Sam! We added a summarized reading/research list just this morning
> for anyone wanting to dig deeper in advance of our convo!
>
> Jen
>
> Jen Kelchner
> CEO
> Speaker, Author, Open Evangelist
>
> M: +1 (615) 663-0524 | O: +1 (888) 775-6736 x700
>
> <http://twitter.com/jenkelchner> <https://linkedin.com/in/jenniferkelchner>
>
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any attachment(s), may
> contain confidential information protected by law. The information contained
> herein is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received
> this message in error, please contact the sender at the e-mail address listed
> above and destroy all copies of the original message, including any
> attachments. Thank you.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 5:56 AM, Sam Knuth <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> This is a great point, Jen and MaryJo. Reading your document, I'm surprised
> we didn't include more about trust in the definition. Sounds like a good
> discussion!
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Jen Kelchner <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> On our January 11 community call, the Open Organization Ambassadors
> discussed the current and future role the concept of "trust" should play
> in the Open Organization Definition (specifically) and in the group's
> thinking and advocacy (more generally). The conversation stemmed from my
> report that LDR21 co-founder MaryJo Burchard and I are hearing customers
> and clients express a need to address trust issues in their organizations.
>
> Current versions of highly visible OpenOrg community materials, however,
> have relatively little to say about trust. So we began to wonder if
> perhaps we were overlooking an important factor of open organizational
> culture.
>
> The community decided to discuss possibilities for analyzing the
> situation and responding to it. We said we'd revisit the issue at the
> February community call, and I promised to provide some background reading.
>
> MaryJo, Bryan, and I have put together a brief overview of the
> issue—what's at stake, what we're finding and hearing, how we might
> proceed, etc. It's ready for review at the following link:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GWT0-TvAKyzPDfN0mQPSkDdgyUK1ah691s07hqHN5j4/edit#heading=h.1e9fb944j2ip
>
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GWT0-TvAKyzPDfN0mQPSkDdgyUK1ah691s07hqHN5j4/edit#heading=h.1e9fb944j2ip>
>
> Ambassadors have access to it by default. Anyone else in the community
> interested in looking at it need merely click the appropriate button to
> request access (terribly sorry about that—just a limitation of our
> current infrastructure).
>
> Let's review this work as a way of framing our thinking about "trust,"
> so we can revisit the issue at the February meeting.
>
> Best-
> Jen
>
>
> Jen Kelchner
> CEO
> Speaker, Author, Open Evangelist
>
> M: +1 (615) 663-0524 <tel:(615)%20663-0524> | O: +1 (888) 775-6736 x700
> <tel:(888)%20775-6736>
>
> <http://twitter.com/jenkelchner> <https://linkedin.com/in/jenniferkelchner>
>
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any attachment(s), may
> contain confidential information protected by law. The information contained
> herein is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received
> this message in error, please contact the sender at the e-mail address listed
> above and destroy all copies of the original message, including any
> attachments. Thank you.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openorg-list mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/openorg-list
> <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/openorg-list>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sam Knuth
> Director, Customer Content Services
> Red Hat, Inc
> Mobile: +1 612-840-1785 <tel:(612)%20840-1785>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openorg-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/openorg-list
_______________________________________________
Openorg-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/openorg-list
