Bartek Kania wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > >>> Hi everyone, >>> I dlike to know what are the finalist name so we can setup a vote... I >>> can't wait to get this over with and see people working again together >>> toward a common goal. >>> >> May I suggest coppice' suggestion, Callweaver? >> > > Isn't that a bit too close to codeweaver? > I don't know if thats a problem tho. > > Besides that, I also like the name. > There are lots of weavers in use - dreamweaver, codeweaver, streamweaver, etc. They are not all in the hands of one group, so I don't see how anybody could claim anything troublesome. Its always possible I missed something, though, so if anyone can find a solid reason why callweaver might step on someone else's toes, please speak up.
Steve _______________________________________________ Openpbx-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
