Is there is any help on the on how to configure this? Anywhere?

 

Looks like the Wiki only covers OpenPBX as T38Gateway()

 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karihaloo,
Ujjval
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 7:33 PM
To: OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] T38 PAssthrough using Open PBX

 

Ingress T38 SOftphone is Kapanga. The Egress is a T38 Test equipment

 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Aloi
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 5:39 PM
To: OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] T38 PAssthrough using Open PBX

 

Don't have an answer - but what T38 softphone are you using?

On 3/8/07, Karihaloo, Ujjval <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

Pardon my ignorance, but should I open to new thread to get a response
OR is this issue more complicated that I thought.

I was working of the belief that T38 Pass through will work on OpenPBX.

 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of Karihaloo,
Ujjval
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:38 AM


To: OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] T38 PAssthrough using Open PBX

 

Appreciate your response. There are some logs in var/log/openpbx.org.
Here is an excerpt from "full" log. I may be just missing a config to
get Pass through to work.

y.y.y.y is the Egress T38 Softphone and n.n.n.n is the NAT IP of the
Ingress Softphone (bold underlined). Seems like OpenPBX detects T38, but
still for some reason does not transmit it across.

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: --- (7 headers 0 lines)
---

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: (Provisional) Stopping
retransmission (but retaining packet) on
'[EMAIL PROTECTED] Request 102: Found

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c:

<-- SIP read from y.y.y.y:5060 :

SIP/2.0 200 OK^M

Content-Type: application/sdp^M

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x:5060 ;received=x;branch=z9hG4bK1457ce92;rport^M

CSeq: 102 INVITE^M

To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=3c1cf5d1-13c4-45efd53a-42f0d21f-5f90^M

From: "T38-Softphone "<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=as2b613278^M

Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Contact: <sip:y.y.y.y>^M

Content-Length: 128^M

^M

v=0^M

o=Omni-Q 1123078687 0 IN IP4 y.y.y.y^M

s=session^M

c=IN IP4 y.y.y.y^M

t=0 0^M

m=image 49160 udptl t38^M

a=sendrecv^M

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: --- (9 headers 7 lines)
---

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Acked pending invite 102

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Stopping retransmission on
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' of Request 102: Match Found

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Got this other party (o =
'Omni-Q 1123078687 0 IN IP4 y.y.y.y')

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: Got T.38 offer in SDP

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Activating UDPTL on
response [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1)

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: T38 state changed to 4 on
channel SIP/T38PROBE-dae2

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: Peer T.38 UDPTL is at port
y.y.y.y:49160

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Peer T.38 UDPTL is at port
y.y.y.y:49160

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Our T38 capability =
(12048), peer T38 capability (0), joint T38 capability (12048)

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: Capabilities: us - 0x8000e
(gsm|ulaw|alaw|h263), peer - audio=0x3d07ff
(g723|gsm|ulaw|alaw|g726|adpcm|slin|lpc10|g729|speex|ilbc|jpeg|h261|h263
|h263p|h264)/video=0x0 (nothing), combined - 0x8000e
(gsm|ulaw|alaw|h263)

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: Non-codec capabilities: us
- 0x1 (telephone-event), peer - 0x7 (telephone-event|CN), combined - 0x1
(telephone-event)

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: build_route: Contact hop:
<sip:y.y.y.y>

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: list_route: hop:
<sip:y.y.y.y>

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: set_destination: Parsing
<sip:y.y.y.y> for address/port to send to

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: set_destination: set
destination to y.y.y.y, port 5060

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: Transmitting (NAT) to
y.y.y.y:5060:

ACK sip:y.y.y.y SIP/2.0^M

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1b4b9939;rport^M

From: "T38-Softphone " < sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>;tag=as2b613278^M

To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=3c1cf5d1-13c4-45efd53a-42f0d21f-5f90^M

Contact: < sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >^M

Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CSeq: 102 ACK^M

User-Agent: OpenPBX^M

Max-Forwards: 70^M

Content-Length: 0^M

^M

---

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1157290896] generator.c: Trying to deactivate
generator in SIP/8036-7e42

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1157290896] generator.c: Generator on
SIP/8036-7e42 stopped after 0 iterations

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1157290896] generator.c: Trying to deactivate
generator in SIP/8036-7e42

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1157290896] generator.c: Generator on
SIP/8036-7e42 stopped after 0 iterations

Mar  8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1077832592] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock
for 'SIP/8036-7e42'

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: We're at x.x.x.x port
17712

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: Adding codec 0x4 (ulaw) to
SDP

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: Adding codec 0x2 (gsm) to
SDP

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: Adding codec 0x8 (alaw) to
SDP

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: Adding non-codec 0x1
(telephone-event) to SDP

Mar  8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: Reliably Transmitting
(NAT) to n.n.n.n:22529:

SIP/2.0 200 OK^M

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.1.68.158:5070;branch=z9hG4bKEF49140971C91C629CA379E9399A5907;received
= 209.244.4.106 <http://209.244.4.106> ;rport=22529^M

From: "T38-Softphone " <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=1173370487^M

To: < sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >;tag=as263b382a^M

Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CSeq: 2 INVITE^M

User-Agent: OpenPBX^M

Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY^M

Max-Forwards: 70^M

Contact: < sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >^M

Content-Type: application/sdp^M

Content-Length: 261^M

^M

v=0^M

o=root 13271 13271 IN IP4 x.x.x.x^M

s=session^M

c=IN IP4 x.x.x.x^M

t=0 0^M

m=audio 17712 RTP/AVP 0 3 8 101^M

a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000^M

a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000^M

a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000^M

a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000^M

a=fmtp:101 0-16^M

a=silenceSupp:off - - - -^M

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of Max CtRiX
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:46 AM
To: OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] T38 PAssthrough using Open PBX

Karihaloo, Ujjval wrote:

> Looks like the OpeNPBX is not passing the T38 information through to
the

> Client 1, hence T38 never gets setup.

Well, looks like that opening another thread instead of answering to a 

previous one can help.

And if you attached some logs, it would be even better...

MAx

_______________________________________________

Openpbx-users mailing list

[email protected] 

http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users 


_______________________________________________
Openpbx-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users




-- 
------
Christopher T Aloi
------ 

_______________________________________________
Openpbx-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users

Reply via email to