Don't have an answer - but what T38 softphone are you using?
On 3/8/07, Karihaloo, Ujjval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but should I open to new thread to get a response OR is this issue more complicated that I thought. I was working of the belief that T38 Pass through will work on OpenPBX. ------------------------------ *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Karihaloo, Ujjval *Sent:* Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:38 AM *To:* OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion *Subject:* Re: [Openpbx-users] T38 PAssthrough using Open PBX Appreciate your response. There are some logs in var/log/openpbx.org. Here is an excerpt from "full" log. I may be just missing a config to get Pass through to work. y.y.y.y is the Egress T38 Softphone and n.n.n.n is the NAT IP of the Ingress Softphone (*bold underlined).* Seems like OpenPBX detects T38, but still for some reason does not transmit it across. Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: --- (7 headers 0 lines) --- Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: (Provisional) Stopping retransmission (but retaining packet) on ' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Request 102: Found Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: <-- SIP read from* **y.y.y.y:5060*: SIP/2.0 200 OK^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP* **x.x.x.x:5060* ;received=x;branch=z9hG4bK1457ce92;rport^M CSeq: 102 INVITE^M To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=3c1cf5d1-13c4-45efd53a-42f0d21f-5f90^M From: "T38-Softphone "<sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=as2b613278^M Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact: <sip:y.y.y.y>^M Content-Length: 128^M ^M v=0^M o=Omni-Q 1123078687 0 IN IP4 y.y.y.y^M s=session^M c=IN IP4 y.y.y.y^M t=0 0^M m=image 49160 udptl t38^M a=sendrecv^M Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: --- (9 headers 7 lines) --- Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Acked pending invite 102 Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Stopping retransmission on ' [EMAIL PROTECTED]' of Request 102: Match Found Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Got this other party (o = 'Omni-Q 1123078687 0 IN IP4 y.y.y.y') Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: Got T.38 offer in SDP Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Activating UDPTL on response [EMAIL PROTECTED] (1) Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: T38 state changed to 4 on channel SIP/T38PROBE-dae2 Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: Peer T.38 UDPTL is at port y.y.y.y:49160 Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Peer T.38 UDPTL is at port y.y.y.y:49160 Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: Our T38 capability = (12048), peer T38 capability (0), joint T38 capability (12048) Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: Capabilities: us - 0x8000e (gsm|ulaw|alaw|h263), peer - audio=0x3d07ff (g723|gsm|ulaw|alaw|g726|adpcm|slin|lpc10|g729|speex|ilbc|jpeg|h261|h263|h263p|h264)/video=0x0 (nothing), combined - 0x8000e (gsm|ulaw|alaw|h263) Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: Non-codec capabilities: us - 0x1 (telephone-event), peer - 0x7 (telephone-event|CN), combined - 0x1 (telephone-event) Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1153612688] chan_sip.c: build_route: Contact hop: <sip:y.y.y.y> Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: list_route: hop: <sip: y.y.y.y> Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: set_destination: Parsing <sip:y.y.y.y> for address/port to send to Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: set_destination: set destination to y.y.y.y, port 5060 Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1153612688] logger.c: Transmitting (NAT) to y.y.y.y:5060: ACK sip:y.y.y.y SIP/2.0^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.x:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1b4b9939;rport^M From: "T38-Softphone " <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=as2b613278^M To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=3c1cf5d1-13c4-45efd53a-42f0d21f-5f90^M Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>^M Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 102 ACK^M User-Agent: OpenPBX^M Max-Forwards: 70^M Content-Length: 0^M ^M --- Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1157290896] generator.c: Trying to deactivate generator in SIP/8036-7e42 Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1157290896] generator.c: Generator on SIP/8036-7e42 stopped after 0 iterations Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1157290896] generator.c: Trying to deactivate generator in SIP/8036-7e42 Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1157290896] generator.c: Generator on SIP/8036-7e42 stopped after 0 iterations Mar 8 11:19:44 DEBUG[1077832592] channel.c: Avoiding initial deadlock for 'SIP/8036-7e42' Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: We're at x.x.x.x port 17712 Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: Adding codec 0x4 (ulaw) to SDP Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: Adding codec 0x2 (gsm) to SDP Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: Adding codec 0x8 (alaw) to SDP Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: Adding non-codec 0x1 (telephone-event) to SDP Mar 8 11:19:44 VERBOSE[1157290896] logger.c: Reliably Transmitting (NAT*) to** **n.n.n.n:22529:* SIP/2.0 200 OK^M Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.68.158:5070 ;branch=z9hG4bKEF49140971C91C629CA379E9399A5907;received=209.244.4.106 ;rport=22529^M From: "T38-Softphone " <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=1173370487^M To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=as263b382a^M Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 2 INVITE^M User-Agent: OpenPBX^M Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY^M Max-Forwards: 70^M Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>^M Content-Type: application/sdp^M Content-Length: 261^M ^M v=0^M o=root 13271 13271 IN IP4 x.x.x.x^M s=session^M c=IN IP4 x.x.x.x^M t=0 0^M m=audio 17712 RTP/AVP 0 3 8 101^M a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000^M a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000^M a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000^M a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000^M a=fmtp:101 0-16^M a=silenceSupp:off - - - -^M -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf Of Max CtRiX Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 4:46 AM To: OpenPBX.org Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Openpbx-users] T38 PAssthrough using Open PBX Karihaloo, Ujjval wrote: > Looks like the OpeNPBX is not passing the T38 information through to the > Client 1, hence T38 never gets setup. Well, looks like that opening another thread instead of answering to a previous one can help. And if you attached some logs, it would be even better... MAx _______________________________________________ Openpbx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users _______________________________________________ Openpbx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users
-- ------ Christopher T Aloi ------
_______________________________________________ Openpbx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-users
