OpenPKG CVS Repository
http://cvs.openpkg.org/
____________________________________________________________________________
Server: cvs.openpkg.org Name: Ralf S. Engelschall
Root: /e/openpkg/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Module: openpkg-src Date: 15-Dec-2004 10:14:36
Branch: HEAD Handle: 2004121509143600
Modified files:
openpkg-src/postgresql8 postgresql8.spec
Log:
modifying package: postgresql8-8.0.0b5 20041214 -> 20041215
Summary:
Revision Changes Path
1.11 +2 -2 openpkg-src/postgresql8/postgresql8.spec
____________________________________________________________________________
patch -p0 <<'@@ .'
Index: openpkg-src/postgresql8/postgresql8.spec
============================================================================
$ cvs diff -u -r1.10 -r1.11 postgresql8.spec
--- openpkg-src/postgresql8/postgresql8.spec 14 Dec 2004 19:34:56 -0000
1.10
+++ openpkg-src/postgresql8/postgresql8.spec 15 Dec 2004 09:14:36 -0000
1.11
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
%define V_pgperl 2.0.2
%define V_psqlodbc 07.03.0200
%define V_slony1 1.0.5
-%define V_pgpool 2.3.2
+%define V_pgpool 2.3.3
# package information
Name: postgresql8
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
Group: Database
License: GPL
Version: %{V_postgresql}b%{V_postgresql_beta}
-Release: 20041214
+Release: 20041215
# package options
%option with_server yes
@@ .
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
CVS Repository Commit List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Wed Dec 15 09:11:49 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 01:11:49 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:11:49 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx125.postini.com ([64.18.0.39] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeVCH-0001cl-00
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:11:49 -0800
Received: from source ([204.153.247.10]) by exprod5mx125.postini.com
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 03:14:30 CST
Received: from host10.octanews.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mapnp.mnforum.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 30DE76C8D7; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 03:14:30 -0600 (CST)
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mtaout-m.tc.umn.edu (mtaout-m.tc.umn.edu [160.94.23.21])
by mapnp.mnforum.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19A56C810
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 03:14:26 -0600 (CST)
Received: from garnet.tc.umn.edu (garnet.tc.umn.edu [160.94.23.2]) by
mtaout-m.tc.umn.edu with ESMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 03:14:25 -0600 (CST)
X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] garnet.tc.umn.edu [160.94.23.2] #+LO+NM
Received: from localhost by garnet.tc.umn.edu with ESMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 03:14:25 -0600
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 03:14:25 -0600 (CST)
From: David Shove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Aaron Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Proportional Representation
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: mpls forum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Minneapolis Issues Forum <mpls.mnforum.org>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://mapnp.Geeks.ORG/pipermail/mpls>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS
autolearn=no version=2.64
With PR in Mpls and 13 seats to fill, 1/13 of the total vote would elect
your choice. 1/13 = about 7.5%.
With only 10 seats, 1/10, or 10% would be required.
I prefer the lower threshold/greater diversity of 1/13 over the higher
threshold/lower diversity of 1/10.
Under the kind of PR I like (STV), you can declare a perty, OR any issue
you like as your party name. Thus there could be a "North Mpls" label, to
counter the feared dominance of white bourgeois from SW. Or a "Labor"
label. Or any other - the voters would winnow out the ones they did/didn't
want, without "wasting" a vote. In a few elections we'd come to see what
issues/parties REALLY move people here - and govt would (have to) be much
more responsive to exactly that. What's not to love?
--David Shove
Roseville
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Aaron Neumann wrote:
> Jeanne Massey wrote:
>
> "AN: One possibility is ONE city-wide district and 10 CMs, elected
> through a Proportional Representation (PR) system fully funded by public
> financing. For example, all political parties get X amount to run
> candidates for City Council seats. On election day, if the DFL gets 50%
> of the votes, they get to elect five CMs to the Council.
>
> How would such a system guarantee geographic representation from all
> parts of the city?"
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It wouldn't, sort of. If it's one, and only one, Mpls Ward for all of
> Mpls, then the council represents the entire city, much like the Mayor.
> If the concern is that some areas would not be represented due to the
> possibility of some CMs not living in every neighborhood (which is also
> true now) and therefore some geographical areas may not be provided with
> as good as city services/representation, then that's noted, but I'm not
> sure that would be the case. Policy setting affects the entire city as
> is, and, in my opinion, that's what a city council is for. It's not so
> much about geographical representation as it is about just plain old
> fashion representation of views, concerns, ideas, etc.
>
> I don't really think that geographical representation has a lot of
> weight behind it. For example, if I lived in Eagan, would the
> Republicans in charge (due to the current winner-take-all electoral
> system) really represent me? Does Norm Coleman really represent my
> views? Do the Republicans who live next-door to me feel represented? If
> I had to move to Utah, would anyone represent my views there? PR is
> based on larger districts therefore reducing the possibility of Reps
> coming from my neighborhood, which again, is also the case now
> (actually, all of my reps don't live in my neighborhood, except those
> from my neighborhood org). But the beauty of PR in Mpls is that such a
> system allows for most or all minority views to be truly represented,
> regardless of where you live.
>
> Aaron Neumann
> Holland Neighborhood, NE Mpls
> REMINDERS:
> 1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL
> PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
> 2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
>
> For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
> For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
> ________________________________
>
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>
REMINDERS:
1. Think a member has violated the rules? Email the list manager at [EMAIL
PROTECTED] before continuing it on the list.
2. Don't feed the troll! Ignore obvious flame-bait.
For state and national discussions see: http://e-democracy.org/discuss.html
For external forums, see: http://e-democracy.org/mninteract
________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Un-subscribe, etc. at: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
From jeff Wed Dec 15 09:14:44 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 01:14:44 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:14:44 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx118.postini.com ([64.18.0.32] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeVF6-0001dC-00
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:14:44 -0800
Received: from source ([66.98.138.60]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod5mx118.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:17:24 PST
Received: from secure1.company-hosting.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by fesim.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBF9BPGT007454
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:11:25 -0700
X-ClientAddr: 216.40.250.211
Received: from mail2.zoneedit.com (mail2.zoneedit.com [216.40.250.211])
by secure1.company-hosting.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
iBF9BF3f007412
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:11:17 -0700
Received: from lockergnome.wc09.net (lockergnome.wc09.net [63.214.0.205])
by mail2.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04575349F67
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 04:15:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hudson.wc4.net (192.168.0.51) by lockergnome.wc09.net
(PowerMTA(TM) v2.0r13) id hnvvs8054e4p; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:44:20 -0800
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
From: "Lockergnome" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: {Dangerous Content?} Lockergnome's Search Engineer ~ December 15, 2004
Date: 15 Dec 2004 00:48:17 PST
Reply-To: "Lockergnome" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: WhatCounts
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-DBHostingEnsim4.1-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-DBHostingEnsim4.1-MailScanner: Found to be infected
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:36.23404/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,REPLY_TO_ULINE_NUMS autolearn=no
version=2.64
Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
Warning: (the entire message).
Warning: Please read the "DBHostingEnsim4.1-Attachment-Warning.txt"
attachment(s) for more information.
This is a message from the MailScanner E-Mail Virus Protection Service
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The original e-mail message contained potentially dangerous content,
which has been removed for your safety.
The content is dangerous as it is often used to spread viruses or to gain
personal or confidential information from you, such as passwords or credit
card numbers.
Due to limitations placed on us by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers
Act 2000, we were unable to keep a copy of the original attachment.
The content filters found this:
MailScanner: Found a form in HTML message
--
Postmaster
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
From jeff Wed Dec 15 09:14:44 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 01:14:44 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:14:44 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx121.postini.com ([64.18.0.35] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeVF6-0001dE-00
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:14:44 -0800
Received: from source ([66.98.138.60]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod5mx121.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:17:24 PST
Received: from secure1.company-hosting.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by fesim.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBF9BPcI007458
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:11:25 -0700
X-ClientAddr: 216.40.250.211
Received: from mail2.zoneedit.com (mail2.zoneedit.com [216.40.250.211])
by secure1.company-hosting.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
iBF9BF3f007405
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 02:11:17 -0700
Received: from lockergnome.wc09.net (lockergnome.wc09.net [63.214.0.205])
by mail2.zoneedit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FDA349F56
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 04:15:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from SHASTA (192.168.0.31) by lockergnome.wc09.net (PowerMTA(TM)
v2.0r13) id hnvvs6054e4n; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:42:26 -0800 (envelope-from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
From: "Lockergnome" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: {Dangerous Content?} Lockergnome's Windows Fanatics ~ December 15, 2004
Date: 15 Dec 2004 00:46:34 PST
Reply-To: "Lockergnome" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Mailer: WhatCounts
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-DBHostingEnsim4.1-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
information
X-DBHostingEnsim4.1-MailScanner: Found to be infected
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:36.23404/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,REPLY_TO_ULINE_NUMS
autolearn=ham version=2.64
Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
Warning: (the entire message).
Warning: Please read the "DBHostingEnsim4.1-Attachment-Warning.txt"
attachment(s) for more information.
This is a message from the MailScanner E-Mail Virus Protection Service
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The original e-mail message contained potentially dangerous content,
which has been removed for your safety.
The content is dangerous as it is often used to spread viruses or to gain
personal or confidential information from you, such as passwords or credit
card numbers.
Due to limitations placed on us by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers
Act 2000, we were unable to keep a copy of the original attachment.
The content filters found this:
MailScanner: Found a form in HTML message
--
Postmaster
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support
From jeff Wed Dec 15 09:15:37 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 01:15:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:15:37 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx126.postini.com ([64.18.0.40] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeVFx-0001dX-00
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:15:37 -0800
Received: from source ([130.79.200.2]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod5mx126.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:18:16 PST
Received: from bes.u-strasbg.fr (localhost.u-strasbg.fr [127.0.0.1])
by bes.u-strasbg.fr (8.12.11/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id iBF9IEpj080236
; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:18:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bes.u-strasbg.fr (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iBF9IESD080227;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:18:14 +0100 (CET)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
X-Authentication-Warning: bes.u-strasbg.fr: sympa set sender to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] using -f
Received: from ns2.u-strasbg.fr (ns2.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.3])
by bes.u-strasbg.fr (8.12.11/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id iBF9I8FY080195
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:18:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mwinf4107.voila.fr (smtp.voila.fr [193.252.22.175] (may be
forged))
by ns2.u-strasbg.fr (8.12.9p2/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id iBF9I8hM039823
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:18:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf4107.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 13A0D18000B2
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:18:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from wwinf4101 (wwinf4101 [172.22.152.28])
by mwinf4107.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0CB731800081
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:18:08 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "\" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pluggin Hibernate / Eclipse
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_495_8774685.1103102288036"
X-Originating-IP: [217.167.130.4]
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:18:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by
milter-greylist-1.5.3 (ns2.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.200.3]); Wed, 15 Dec 2004
10:18:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Antivirus: scanned by sophos at u-strasbg.fr
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sequence: 3025
Errors-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
X-no-archive: yes
List-Id: <java.u-strasbg.fr>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Owner: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://listes.u-strasbg.fr/wws/arc/java>
X-pstn-levels: (S:20.56846/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET autolearn=no version=2.64
------=_Part_495_8774685.1103102288036
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bonjour,
j'essaie de d=E9couvrir le pluggin hibernate (HibernateSynchronizer) et je =
le trouvais tr=E8s pratique pour la g=E9n=E9ration des fichiers .hbm =E0 pa=
rtir de la base de donn=E9es mais =E0 priori il faut remanier ces fichiers =
parce qu'ils ne r=E9pondent pas =E0 la DTD !
Et puis je trouve la g=E9n=E9ration des classes pas tr=E8s clean non plus ;=
par exemple pour une simple table Personne j'aimerai avoir un seul objet m=
=E9tier Personne et un DAO hors le pluggin me g=E9n=E8re 5 classes :
un "BasePersonne",=20
un "Personne" ,
un _RootDAO,
un _BaseRootDAO,
et un BasePersonneDAO
J'aimerai savoir si vous avez des retours "positifs" sur ce pluggin et si v=
ous trouvez le code g=E9n=E9r=E9 "propre" et facilement utilisable et maint=
enable, et =E9ventuellement est-ce qu'il y a des subtilit=E9s que je n'aura=
is pas vues ?
Merci.
------------------------------------------
Faites un voeu et puis Voila ! www.voila.fr=20
------=_Part_495_8774685.1103102288036
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<P>Bonjour,</P>
<P>j'essaie de d=E9couvrir le pluggin hibernate (HibernateSynchronizer) et =
je le trouvais tr=E8s pratique pour la g=E9n=E9ration des fichiers .hbm =E0=
partir de la base de donn=E9es mais =E0 priori il faut remanier ces fichie=
rs parce qu'ils ne r=E9pondent pas =E0 la DTD !</P>
<P>Et puis je trouve la g=E9n=E9ration des classes pas tr=E8s clean non plu=
s ; par exemple pour une simple table Personne j'aimerai avoir un seul obje=
t m=E9tier Personne et un DAO hors le pluggin me g=E9n=E8re 5 classes :</P>
<P>un "BasePersonne", </P>
<P>un "Personne" ,</P>
<P>un _RootDAO,</P>
<P>un _BaseRootDAO,</P>
<P>et un BasePersonneDAO</P>
<P>J'aimerai savoir si vous avez des retours "positifs" sur ce pluggin et s=
i vous trouvez le code g=E9n=E9r=E9 "propre" et facilement utilisable et ma=
intenable, et =E9ventuellement est-ce qu'il y a des subtilit=E9s que je n'a=
urais pas vues ?</P>
<P> </P>
<P>Merci.<BR><BR><BR></P><BR>------------------------------------------<BR>=
<BR>Faites un voeu et puis Voila ! www.voila.fr <BR><BR>
------=_Part_495_8774685.1103102288036--
From jeff Wed Dec 15 09:15:52 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed Dec 15 01:15:52 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [email protected]
Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:15:52 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx27.postini.com ([64.18.0.182] helo=psmtp.com)
by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CeVGC-0001e7-00
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:15:52 -0800
Received: from source ([129.69.139.20]) (using TLSv1) by
exprod5mx27.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:18:30 PST
Received: from sympa by octopus.faveve.uni-stuttgart.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CeVNv-0003h3-RG; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:23:52 +0100
Received: from mail by octopus.faveve.uni-stuttgart.de with spam-scanned (Exim
4.34)
id 1CeVNo-0003fq-Ej
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:23:44 +0100
Received: from lilo.faveve.uni-stuttgart.de ([129.69.139.1] ident=mail)
by octopus.faveve.uni-stuttgart.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1CeVNn-0003fT-DD; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:23:43 +0100
Received: from [12.41.222.136] (helo=129.69.139.1)
by lilo.faveve.uni-stuttgart.de with smtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
id 1CeN4n-0006yL-00; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 01:31:34 +0100
Language: English
Content-Alias: 2333784522981282
In-Reply-To: "brilliant rumen alai architectural nottingham"
Reply-To: "Mr. Fry has approved you" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Mr. Fry has approved you" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:27:31 -0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="--09-57537-3457-549-08542"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-DSPAM-Result: Spam
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.6733
X-DSPAM-Probability: 1.0000
X-DSPAM-Signature: 41c002a0141181266916925
X-DSPAM-User: basin
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sequence: 15853
Errors-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
X-no-archive: yes
List-Id: <basin.lists.faveve.uni-stuttgart.de>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Owner: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <https://lists.faveve.uni-stuttgart.de/sympa/arc/basin>
Subject: [basin] He has $449,233 waiting for you
Sender: Sympa mailing list manager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-pstn-levels: (S: 3.40029/99.46199 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:93.2944 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_NET_HELO,
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DSBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,
RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO autolearn=no version=2.64
----09-57537-3457-549-08542
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-5939-4"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Hello,
I sent you an email recently and I'd like to confirm everything now.
Please read the info below and let me know if you have any questions.
We are accepting your m ortgage qualifications. If you have bad cr edit,
it's ok. You can get a $200,000 loan for a $525 per month payment.
Approval process will only take 1 minute. Just visit the link below and
fill out this quick and easy form.
http://devoid.gffefv.net/azcbu
Thank You for your time,
Sincere Regards,
Manager: Damion Rosado
First National Bank
384 First Street
Williamsport, PA
!DSPAM:41c002a0141181266916925!
----09-57537-3457-549-08542--
