On Sun, Feb 02, 2003, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
> > openpkg-re/vcheck vc.chkrootkit
> > openpkg-src/chkrootkit chkrootkit.spec
> > openpkg-web news.txt
> >
> > Log:
> > upgrading package: chkrootkit 0.39 -> 0.39a
> >
> > - version = 0.39
> > + version = 0.39a
> >
> This change broke our chkrootkit package. It appears to package a non-release
> grade version of chkrootkit. I think we should back out this change.
Can you explain what it actually broke? Which platform? And why is 0.39a
a non-release grade version? Both according to the website and FTP
server 0.39a looks like a bugfix version of 0.39 and not an "alpha" or
whatever version. And even if I look at the diff...
openpkg-dev$ diff -ru3 chkrootkit-0.39 chkrootkit-0.39a
diff -ru3 chkrootkit-0.39/chkproc.c chkrootkit-0.39a/chkproc.c
--- chkrootkit-0.39/chkproc.c Thu Jan 30 00:03:31 2003
+++ chkrootkit-0.39a/chkproc.c Fri Jan 31 12:43:56 2003
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/*
- (C) Nelson Murilo - 2002/08/08
- Version 0.6
+ (C) Nelson Murilo - 2003/01/31
+ Version 0.7
C port from chkproc.pl code from Klaus Steding-Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and Cristine Hoepers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +little output changes.
@@ -47,7 +47,8 @@
#if defined(__sun)
#define PS "ps -edf"
#else
-#define PS "ps mauxwww"
+#define PS "ps mauxwww 2> /dev/null"
+#define PS1 "ps auxwww"
#endif
int psproc [MAX_PROCESSES+1];
@@ -90,8 +91,13 @@
if (!isalpha(*buf))
#endif
{
- fprintf(stderr, "OooPS!\n");
- exit(2);
+ ps = popen(PS1, "r");
+ fgets(buf, MAX_BUF, ps); /* Skip header */
+ if (!isalpha(*buf))
+ {
+ fprintf(stderr, "OooPS!\n");
+ exit(2);
+ }
}
for (i = FIRST_PROCESS; i <= MAX_PROCESSES; i++) /* Init matrix */
psproc[i] = dirproc[i] = 0;
I do not see any signs that this is something else that just a little
bugfix release. So, can you give more details, please?
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
