On Mon, Feb 03, 2003, Michael Schloh von Bennewitz wrote:
> > Can you explain what it actually broke? Which platform? And why is 0.39a
> > a non-release grade version? Both according to the website and FTP
> > server 0.39a looks like a bugfix version of 0.39 and not an "alpha" or
> > whatever version. And even if I look at the diff...
> >
> That the version was not taken to 0.40 is a clue that this version did not
> undergo regression testing, and it becomes clear with a simple build.
>
> In any case the reason that this is broken is that PS1 is only conditionally
> defined (see your diff) and then later used unconditionally.
Oh, I see. Good catch. Ok, I've downgraded the package now. Thanks.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
