On Fri, Sep 12, 2003, Matt Hoosier wrote:
> How do the University of Washington's licensing terms for the 'pine'
> email client agree with the OpenPKG mission? I know there are several
> specifications for commercial software in the repository, but this isn't
> quite the same as the UW policy on distributing patches.
>
> If the licensing terms are compatible, I have a 'pine' package that I
> would like to contribute.
I have to check the license terms in detail. But if all fails we just
can make a %NoSource package out of it. But before we can do this,
please upload your Pine package first. Thanks.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
