How do the University of Washington's licensing terms for the 'pine' email client agree with the OpenPKG mission? I know there are several specifications for commercial software in the repository, but this isn't quite the same as the UW policy on distributing patches.
If the licensing terms are compatible, I have a 'pine' package that I would like to contribute. -- Matt Hoosier UNIX Administrator / Accounts Manager Department of Computing and Information Sciences Kansas State University
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
