On Wed, May 11, 2005, Matthias KURZ wrote: > And how could this all be decided, so that we can go on ? Should > there be a voting ? > No voting is necessary, but we need:
1) A documenter to write the new standard and change a single package 2) A reviewer to ensure accordance with OpenPKG methodology 3) A volunteer to integrate the standard into lint logic 4) A volunteer to do all the .spec modifications If nobody is willing to review (2), then posting a diff to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is good enough. If nobody is willing to do the many modifications (4), then either the topic goes on the backburner or we accept a half solution. If nobody is willing to start (1), then the topic goes on the backburner. ...or we use a totally other model should someone have a better idea. > I'm missing rse's voice, anyway. > Architectural changes like this one are not allowed without Ralf's approval of course. Due to his somewhat escalated workload right now he will probably only be able to say 'okay' or 'not okay' at or shortly after review. Ralf, please object if I've gotten that wrong. Matthias if you would like to volunteer for (1), then one possible first step would be forming a standard based on any agreements reached in this email thread. Whatever lacks agreement you choose yourself (fast) or propose to the list (slow but more reliable). Regards, Michael -- Michael Schloh von Bennewitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Development Team, Operations Northern Europe Cable & Wireless Telecommunications Services Tel +49-89-92699-227, Fax +49-89-92699-808
pgplhCg1FOjEW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
