> Ahhhh, ok. Now fixed in GNU shtool and a snapshot of it is now included
> in the latest "openpkg" package from CURRENT. At least this now shows
> the correct identification for both an emulated uname of an AIX 5.2
> under PASE (according to your output above) and a real AIX 5.1.

Ok your new shtool provide :

[EMAIL PROTECTED] c_gomez]$ ./shtool2 platform --type=all-in-one
concise architecture class:      powerpc
regular architecture class:      powerpc
verbose architecture class:      powerpc
concise architecture product:    powerpc
regular architecture product:    powerpc
verbose architecture product:    powerpc
concise architecture technology: powerpc
regular architecture technology: powerpc
verbose architecture technology: powerpc
concise system class:            SVR4
regular system class:            SVR4
verbose system class:            SVR4
concise system product:          AIX 5.2
regular system product:          AIX 5.2.0
verbose system product:          IBM AIX 5.2.0.0
concise system technology:       AIX 5.2
regular system technology:       AIX 5.2.0
verbose system technology:       IBM AIX 5.2.0.0

For previous it was 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] c_gomez]$ ./shtool platform --type=all-in-one
concise architecture class:      powerpc
regular architecture class:      powerpc
verbose architecture class:      powerpc
concise architecture product:    powerpc
regular architecture product:    powerpc
verbose architecture product:    powerpc
concise architecture technology: powerpc
regular architecture technology: powerpc
verbose architecture technology: powerpc
concise system class:            SVR4
regular system class:            SVR4
verbose system class:            SVR4
concise system product:          2.0
regular system product:          AIX 2.0.0
verbose system product:          IBM AIX 2.0.0.5
concise system technology:       2.0
regular system technology:       AIX 2.0.0
verbose system technology:       IBM AIX 2.0.0.5


> Btw, doesn't a /usr/bin/oslevel exist in PASE?

Nope but I could insert a command in PATH if necessary.

> Or is this there under a different path?
> 
> And one more thing for the whole AIX issue: we need additions to the
> %pre and %post sections of openpkg.spec to automatically and correctly
> setup user/group/cron/init-script etc under AIX. Do you have this
> available, too?

What do you means ?
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project                                    www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List                   openpkg-dev@openpkg.org

Reply via email to