Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2016, 14:53:02 schrieb Michael Reichert: > Hi, > > Am 2016-08-29 um 21:46 schrieb Rolf Eike Beer: > > I wonder if we should retire the "deelectrified" tag entirely. I think > > it's > > simply a bad idea. There is the abandoned-namespace that we already use > > for > > the type of rail and similar things, so why not use > > abandoned:electrified=*? This has the advantage that we can also use e.g. > > abandoned:voltage and abandoned:frequency. > > deelectrified=* was added to the wiki page > (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging) by > YamaOfParadise about two years ago. > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=OpenRailwayMap%2FTagging&ty > pe=revision&diff=1070191&oldid=1069876 > > YamaOfParadies, could you explain why you chose this tag? Or did you > just add it to document its usage? > > I myself think that using the lifecycle prefix scheme is a good idea.
Just to have that archived: YamaOfParadies agreed on using the lifecycle prefixes on IRC. We'll have to update the wiki. Eike
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openrailwaymap mailing list Openrailwaymap@openrailwaymap.org http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/lists/listinfo/openrailwaymap