Thank you so much. Btw, in the same manner, should we move from "railway=abandoned" (wich told nothing about the type of the railway) to the newer tagging scheme "abandoned:railway=*" in order to be consistent with the namespaces life cycle perefixes (and mantain the information about the railway's type) ? _______________________________________________ Openrailwaymap mailing list Openrailwaymap@openrailwaymap.org http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/lists/listinfo/openrailwaymap
- [openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrified" really a... Rolf Eike Beer
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrified"... Michael Reichert
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrified&q... Rolf Eike Beer
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is "deelectrifi... Rolf Eike Beer
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is "deelect... Mauro Costantini
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is "de... Rolf Eike Beer
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is &quo... Michael Reichert
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is ... Denis Stein
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is ... Alexander Matheisen
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is ... Denis Stein
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is ... Alexander Matheisen
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is ... Denis Stein
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is ... Denis Stein
- Re: [openrailwaymap] Is ... Michael Reichert