> Sure, but what do you mean by "get rid of"? We still need to support > it because it's a valid instruction in both 32- and 64-bit > implementations.
When reading the spec, it takes a while to realise that those instructions are just a register copy for 32-bit implementations, we should at least reword the spec to make it clear. Like I said, they're unnecessary instructions and never worked properly. Nobody will probably care if we take them off the spec (for 32-bit implementations). Or is there a reason why we have 3 ways to copy a register for 32-bit processors? Regards, rdiez _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
