We could remove all logical and arithmetic instructions and replace them with a nand. (sarcasm implied)
---Matthew Hicks On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 3:54 PM, R. Diez <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Sure, but what do you mean by "get rid of"? We still need to support >> it because it's a valid instruction in both 32- and 64-bit >> implementations. > > When reading the spec, it takes a while to realise that those instructions > are just a register copy for 32-bit implementations, we should at least > reword the spec to make it clear. Like I said, they're unnecessary > instructions and never worked properly. Nobody will probably care if we take > them off the spec (for 32-bit implementations). Or is there a reason why we > have 3 ways to copy a register for 32-bit processors? > > Regards, > rdiez > _______________________________________________ > OpenRISC mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
