On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 12:23 +0100, R. Diez wrote: 
> Hi Jeremy:
> 
> Yesterday I ran my build framework from scratch and it failed because
> apparently you've moved some subdirectories around in the Subversion
> repository. I found the following in the new README file. 
> 
> 
> ---------8<---------8<---------gnu-dev
> 
>     Holds development versions of the tools.
> 
> Note. Most of the development version code is now held in the openrisc
>       organization on GitHub. Please check there for the latest development
>       versions. More details on the wiki.
> ---------8<---------8<---------
> 
> I guess the Wiki has not been updated yet. From the above I'm not sure
> whether the gnu-dev version is the preferred one for the OpenRISC
> toolchain, or whether I should switch to the GitHub repos.Or do they
> mirror or follow one another?

Hi Ruben,

Apologies, you were caught out halfway through the operation. This was a
long-standing request, to reduce the size of the SVN source directory
people need to check out. I started it during the bug-bashing session at
this weekend's project meeting, but didn't finish the work.

The stable tool chain (based on GCC 4.5) is in the gnu-stable directory.
Legacy versions are in gnu-old and new (non-stable) versions are in
gnu-dev.

However, as noted, most of the development tool chain work (GCC 4.8 and
LLVM) is now done on GitHub, so the gnu-dev version only has some
part-started GDB 7.2 work.

I'll update the Wiki very shortly.

Best wishes,


Jeremy

-- 
Tel:      +44 (1590) 610184
Cell:     +44 (7970) 676050
SkypeID: jeremybennett
Email:   [email protected]
Web:     www.embecosm.com

_______________________________________________
OpenRISC mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc

Reply via email to