On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:08:01AM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 01:08 +0000, Julius Baxter wrote: > > Hi all > > > > I've updated the architecture specification, adding things we agreed > > upon at the project meeting. > > Hi Julius, > > Good on you for taking on this task. > > It's a bit tricky figuring out what's actually changed... any suggestion > for how I should go about finding the _new_ text? >
I agree, maybe you could mark the added/changed sections with red text or something? > Why did we choose r3 for the struct return location? > It was not so much "us" choosing it. gcc has done it all along, creating a "defacto" standard for it, now we are just documenting it. That said, I don't see using r3 as a bad choice, do you? Stefan _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
