Please file a bug so there is a record of what changes have been made
to the processor.  The open list of bugs has been vital to my research
and the main reason why I selected OR1200 over Leon3.


---Matthew Hicks


On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Franck Jullien
<[email protected]> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Franck Jullien <[email protected]>
> Date: 2012/11/3
> Subject: Re: [OpenRISC] [Openrisc] Problems with debbuging on de0_nano board
> To: Marek Czerski <[email protected]>
> Cc : Matthew Hicks <[email protected]>,
> [email protected], [email protected]
>
>
> 2012/11/3 Franck Jullien <[email protected]>:
>> 2012/11/2 Marek Czerski <[email protected]>:
>>>> This is a known problem, a (dirty) workaround is to just disable the
>>>> CRC checking:
>>>
>>> ok, it helped.
>>>
>>>> >> What I can see when using the simulation with GDB over VPI (and the
>>>> >> claasic dbg_if) is that the instruction replaced by the TRAP (for sw
>>>> >> breakpoint) never gets executed (see waveform).
>>>
>>>
>>> I can confirm this behavior both in simulation (dbg_if + VPI) and on
>>> hardware with adv_dbg_if + adv_jtag_bridge.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> >> I did the same test on my hardware platform with openOCD + adv_dbg_if
>>>> >> and r6 gets updated....
>>>
>>>
>>> With adv_dbg_if + OpneOCD it works as Franck said.
>>>
>>> It seems that the issue is related with the software since adv_jtag_bridge
>>> can properly sigle-step through jump instructions and OpenOCD can properly
>>> handle software breakpoints.
>>>
>>> --
>>> mgr inż. Marek Czerski
>>> +48 696 842 686
>>>
>>
>> One of the problem is showed on waveforms I posted. The instruction
>> trapped doesn't get executed after the breakpoint is removed.
>>
>> I have a fix almost ready. I checked for a debug unstall condition
>> plus a trap condition in or1200_du (dbg_stall && |except_stop). Then,
>> when this event occur, I flush the entire pipeline (in or1200_ctrl)
>> and set the pc to npc in or1200_genpc (which is equal to the trapped
>> instruction address).
>>
>> Franck.
>
> I have a fix ready. I works on VPI simulation. I don't know if it's a
> good or the right way to fix this but at least it seems to work....
> If someone could give it a try on an hardware platform that would be
> great (because I'm not home this week end).
>
> Franck.
>
> I think we should apply this patch as it is only concerning the debug
> part of or1200 and it solves the problem.
>
> Marek and I have been using it for some times and didn't find any side
> effect.
>
> (should I fill a bug in bugzilla or it is too late now ?)
>
> Franck.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenRISC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
>
_______________________________________________
OpenRISC mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc

Reply via email to