If we have a sound verification methodology with a comprehensive regression test suite then it is easier for anybody who wants to work and improve its performance. The mor1kx implementation is better and can be handled by Orpsoc but I noticed a few bugs which will be better tackled if we have such methodology.
But I am glad that John and Olof think that a general verification framework can be developed, not only for OR. On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Sébastien Bourdeauducq < [email protected]> wrote: > On 02/15/2014 09:44 PM, Olof Kindgren wrote: > > Brief explanation: one of the main hurdles to adoption of OpenRISC (OR) > > based SoC's is the lack of credible verification results. > > From my perspective, it's low performance and excessive area. Could it > be brought near LM32 levels? > > Sébastien > > _______________________________________________ > OpenRISC mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc > -- Jose T. de Sousa, PhD Office: +351 213 100 213 R. Alves Redol 9 1000-029 Lisboa Portugal
_______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
