Which bugs are you mentioning Jose ?
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Jose Teixeira de Sousa <[email protected]>wrote: > If we have a sound verification methodology with a comprehensive > regression test suite then it is easier for anybody who wants to work and > improve its performance. The mor1kx implementation is better and can be > handled by Orpsoc but I noticed a few bugs which will be better tackled if > we have such methodology. > > But I am glad that John and Olof think that a general verification > framework can be developed, not only for OR. > > > > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Sébastien Bourdeauducq < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 02/15/2014 09:44 PM, Olof Kindgren wrote: >> > Brief explanation: one of the main hurdles to adoption of OpenRISC (OR) >> > based SoC's is the lack of credible verification results. >> >> From my perspective, it's low performance and excessive area. Could it >> be brought near LM32 levels? >> >> Sébastien >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenRISC mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc >> > > > > -- > Jose T. de Sousa, PhD > Office: +351 213 100 213 > R. Alves Redol 9 > 1000-029 Lisboa > Portugal > > _______________________________________________ > OpenRISC mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc > >
_______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
