On 09/03/14 10:19, Christian Svensson wrote: > Hi, > > nd in or1knd is stands for No Delay. It's or1k but with no delay slot.
Hi Christian, I do rather wonder if this justifies having a different architecture name. I would expect it to be an option in the tool chain (-mno-delay for example). The usual case where you have variants in the architecture name is for endianness. For example arc (little-endian) and arceb (bit-endian). What do we do about the little-endian variants of OR1K. Do we have or1kndel and or1kel? Jeremy > On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Christian Svensson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Since binutils contains code that targets or1knd, I'm going to submit >> >> Pardon my ignorance, but what's the difference between or1k and or1knd? >> I tried Google, but didn't become wiser. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Gr{oetje,eeting}s, >> >> Geert >> >> -- >> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- >> [email protected] >> >> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But >> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like >> that. >> -- Linus Torvalds -- Tel: +44 (1590) 610184 Cell: +44 (7970) 676050 SkypeID: jeremybennett Twitter: @jeremypbennett Email: [email protected] Web: www.embecosm.com _______________________________________________ OpenRISC mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc
