Re: [OpenRISC] or1knd? (was: Re: [Openrisc] Patching config.sub / config.guess)

Sun, 09 Mar 2014 10:06:05 -0700 

On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Jeremy Bennett
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info. This seems a compelling reason to just have or1k
> and dropping or1knd.
>
I don't agree. You would have to explicitly do something like
./configure --target=or1k-linux CFLAGS='-mno-delay' for every package
you would build.
I think having a compiler with sensible defaults is the way to go. If
you're developing for a or1k variant without delay slots the default
output wouldn't even run.
_______________________________________________
OpenRISC mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openrisc.net/listinfo/openrisc

Reply via email to