Hi Lennart,
Some initial comments:
1) With this proposal of IMCN becoming more role aware, i think it
would be more appropriate
to make IMCN as an AMF component!?
2)Also for communication between imcn process <-> ntfs process, i think
MDS should be used (both have service Ids) instead
of using a new mechanism that is really not required.
3) In the current implementation when NTFS receives quiesced role first
it itself becomes quiesced then
it tries to handle IMCN in handle_state_ntfimcn().But as mentioned
in the proposal, when NTFS becomes standby from active
it will send message to active IMCN to become standby. So there
will be a situation when IMCN will still be active on Quiesced NTFS and
during this time it will get TRY_AGAIN for all notifications and it
will not be able to send even n-message to stdby IMCN.
Will it not lead to accumulation of pending notifications?
4)Will the Content of n-message for config data have CCB id and
operationType alone
OR
will it contain full notification also?
I have not gone through the data structure part (nlist), will get back
on that soon!
Thanks
Praveen
On 30-Aug-13 8:15 PM, Lennart Lund wrote:
> Hi,
> To fix this ticket will be rather complicated so instead of just
> implementing a fix I have created a proposal for how to do this to
> give a chance for a discussion and early feedback.
> Please read and give feedback. See attached file.
> I have also attached the file to the ticket.
> Thanks'
> Lennart
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT
2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT
3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
