Summary: quiesced role honoring SI dependency during node lock in NWAY [#90] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): amf #90 Peer Reviewer(s): Hans F., Nagendra Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>> Affected branch(es):Default Development branch: <<IF ANY GIVE THE REPO URL>>
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- Please see the commit log below. changeset 2c38d59dc53c784121ac12029b5e3754989f19e6 Author: [email protected] Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:24:42 +0530 amfd: rename SI dep related function to be used by other red models [#90] In this patch two functions have been renamed and moved from sg_2n_fsm.cc and sgproc.cc to siass.cc. These functions will used by other red models also in the context of SI dependency feature. At present sg_2n_fsm is using these functions, so names have been changed in sg_2n_fsm.cc changeset d1bb7472d7fd3af3d85be157770f168ca9f67834 Author: [email protected] Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:30:54 +0530 amfd : assign quiesced role honoring SI dep during node lock in NWAY model [#90] During Node lock and SU lock, if SI dependency is configured within SU then quiesced assignment will be given in the reverse order of SI dependecy. Complete diffstat: ------------------ osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/susi.h | 2 + osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_2n_fsm.cc | 48 +++++---------------------------- osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_nway_fsm.cc | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sgproc.cc | 59 +----------------------------------------- osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/si_dep.cc | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/siass.cc | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 174 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- Tested configuration given in the ticket description. Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- Fist dependents get the quiesced role then sponsors. Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- Ack from Hans or Nagendra. Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 y y x86_64 n n powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
