Hi Hans F/N,

Any comment ?

Thanks
-Nagu

-----Original Message-----
From: Nagendra Kumar 
Sent: 15 November 2013 17:51
To: hans.fe...@ericsson.com; hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for amfd: Use correct CLC 
command to term/clean component [#104]

Summary: amfd: Use correct CLC command to term/clean component [#104] Review 
request for Trac Ticket(s): #104 Peer Reviewer(s): Hans F. Hans N Pull request 
to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>> Affected branch(es): All 
Development branch: Default 

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
This is just compiled and not tested. It is just to review the approach.

changeset 9a68f42eeed294786d8b895b78ff9a5228704a5f
Author: Nagendra Kumar<nagendr...@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:48:13 +0530

        amfd: Use correct CLC command to term/clean component [#104]


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/clc.cc              |  64 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/compdb.cc           |  23 ++++++++++++++++-------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/include/avnd_comp.h |   3 +++
 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Not tested.


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack for approach.


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, 
Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app 
hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server.
Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT 
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance 
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your 
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to