Recently few tickets have been opened in this area. I think, after fixing all these pending tickets a new enhancement ticket can be raised to solve it more generically for all the entities.
Thanks, Praveen On 11-May-16 5:32 PM, Hans Nordebäck wrote: > It looks as Praveen mentions in the ticket, msg based checkpoint and imm > apply callback are competing. There are several different cases in ng where > the node in nodegroup_db already is deleted. Lennart updated #1766 > yesterday, an assert in dec_ng_admin_state. It looks we need a complete > solution to this > mbcsv - imm apply "race". > > /Thanks HansN > > On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Nagendra Kumar wrote: >> Tx for pointing out. >> But I see that it is returning from there. >> In my patch it works as continue. >> Can you please check once. >> >> Since the test steps was not mentioned, so was not sure about the >> patch review. >> >> Tx >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected], [email protected], >> [email protected], [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 4:27:48 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, >> Mumbai, New Delhi >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 1] amfd: avoid null pointer access [#1823] >> >> Hi Nagu, >> >> this is already handled by ticket #1766 and a patch was sent out April >> 15. /Thanks HansN >> >> On 05/11/2016 11:28 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/nodegroup.cc | 4 ++++ >>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> >>> Amfd is crashing because of null pointer acceess. >>> This can happen if the node is removed from nodegroup >>> at Act Amfd, but not removed at Standby Amfd. >>> But node was deleted from both Act and Standby Amfd. >>> >>> diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/nodegroup.cc >>> b/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/nodegroup.cc >>> --- a/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/nodegroup.cc >>> +++ b/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/nodegroup.cc >>> @@ -467,6 +467,8 @@ static SaAisErrorT ng_ccb_completed_dele >>> ++iter) { >>> node = avd_node_get(*iter); >>> + if (node == nullptr) >>> + continue; >>> >>> TRACE("%s", node->name.value); >>> @@ -585,6 +587,8 @@ static void ng_ccb_apply_delete_hdlr(Ccb >>> for (std::set<std::string>::const_iterator iter = >>> ng->saAmfNGNodeList.begin(); >>> iter != ng->saAmfNGNodeList.end(); ++iter) { >>> AVD_AVND *node = avd_node_get(*iter); >>> + if (node == nullptr) >>> + continue; >>> node->admin_ng = nullptr; >>> node->su_cnt_admin_oper = 0; >>> } > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
